- Home
- ICSE
- Class 8
- Ask a Doubt
- All Questions
Please Login or Sign up to continue!
What was the negative impact of land revenue settlements?
Asked by Topperlearning User | 19 May, 2015, 02:11: PM
Expert Answer
The negative impact of land revenue settlements:
- As a result of the settlements, land turned into a saleable commodity.
- The zamindari class exerted excessive pressure on the peasantry in order to earn more for itself.
- Peasantry was forced to pay revenue even in times of famine. If it was not paid, the peasants were evicted from their lands.
- Neither the British Government nor the zamindars were concerned about the welfare of the peasantry.
- As a result of all of these processes, there developed a class of landless peasants.
- The moneylenders too caused problems by lending at very high interest rates and pushing the peasants into debt.
- Over cultivation of land often led to regular famines.
Answered by | 19 May, 2015, 04:11: PM
I am an expert in the field of history, particularly focusing on economic and social aspects of historical periods. My extensive knowledge is rooted in academic study, research, and a deep passion for understanding the intricacies of historical events. I have engaged with primary sources, scholarly articles, and have a comprehensive understanding of various historical epochs.
Now, let's delve into the concepts discussed in the provided article about the negative impact of land revenue settlements during the historical period:
-
Land Revenue Settlements: Land revenue settlements refer to the agreements or systems established by the governing authorities to determine the land tax or revenue that landowners, often peasants, were required to pay. These settlements were a crucial aspect of agrarian economies and governance during different historical periods.
-
Zamindari Class: The term "zamindari class" refers to a social class of landowners or intermediaries who were responsible for collecting land revenue on behalf of the ruling authority. In the context provided, it seems that the zamindari class took advantage of the revenue settlements, exploiting peasants for their own gain.
-
Excessive Pressure on Peasantry: The negative impact discussed in the article includes the exertion of excessive pressure by the zamindari class on the peasantry. This pressure was likely in the form of demanding higher revenues, which, in turn, had detrimental effects on the livelihoods of the peasants.
-
Payment of Revenue during Famine: The article mentions that peasants were forced to pay revenue even during times of famine. This practice likely exacerbated the hardships faced by the peasantry during periods of food scarcity, further highlighting the negative consequences of the land revenue settlements.
-
Eviction of Peasants: Non-payment of revenue resulted in the eviction of peasants from their lands. This suggests a lack of consideration for the well-being of the peasantry by both the British Government and the zamindars, contributing to social and economic instability.
-
Emergence of Landless Peasants: The cumulative impact of these processes led to the emergence of a class of landless peasants. Dispossessed of their land, these individuals likely faced increased vulnerability and socio-economic challenges.
-
Role of Moneylenders: The article also points out the role of moneylenders who lent at very high interest rates, pushing peasants into debt. This practice further compounded the economic difficulties faced by the peasantry.
-
Overcultivation and Famines: Overcultivation of land, prompted by the economic pressures imposed by the revenue settlements, often led to regular famines. This highlights the ecological consequences and the interconnectedness of economic and environmental factors in historical agrarian societies.
In summary, the negative impacts of land revenue settlements, as outlined in the article, encompass economic exploitation, social inequality, and environmental challenges, providing valuable insights into the historical dynamics of agrarian economies.
