Subject to Mortgage: Explained (2024)

Posted by Brian Burke on Thursday, August 17, 2023 at 6:00:52 PM By Brian Burke / August 17, 2023 Comment

"Subject to Mortgage" is a term used in real estate transactions that refers to a situation where a buyer purchases a property while leaving the existing mortgage in place. In other words, the buyer takes over the ownership of the property. Still, the original mortgage loan remains in the seller's name. This can be a creative financing strategy that benefits both the buyer and the seller under certain circ*mstances.

How"Subject to Mortgage" Works:

Seller's Perspective:In a "subject to" transaction, the seller usually faces financial difficulties or wants to sell the property quickly and is unable or unwilling to continue making mortgage payments. Rather than foreclosing on the property, the seller finds a buyer willing to take over the mortgage payments and assume ownership.
Buyer's Perspective:The buyer in a "subject to" deal agrees to purchase the property with the understanding that they are not taking out a new mortgage in their name. Instead, they are assuming the responsibility for the existing mortgage payments. This can be an attractive option for buyers who may not qualify for a new mortgage due to credit issues or other financial constraints.
Ownership Transfer:The buyer takes legal property ownership through the purchase agreement. However, the mortgage remains in the seller's name, and the lender often needs to be made aware of the change in ownership.
Mortgage Payments:The buyer is responsible for making the mortgage payments directly to the lender on behalf of the seller. This requires a high level of trust between the parties involved.
Risks and Considerations:There are risks associated with this type of transaction. If the buyer stops making mortgage payments, the lender could foreclose on the property, and the seller's credit could be negatively affected. Additionally, some mortgage agreements have "due on sale" clauses, meaning the entire loan balance becomes due if the property is sold or ownership is transferred.

Ready to find your dream home in Colorado?
Let us help you. Call or Text Kenna Real Estate at303-955-4220to get personalized assistance from our expert real estate agents. Find out what your home is worth in today's market.

Rules and Legal Considerations:

Due on Sale Clause:As mentioned earlier, many mortgages include a "due on sale" clause, which allows the lender to demand full repayment of the loan if the property is sold or ownership is transferred. This means that, technically, the lender could call the loan due upon discovering the change in ownership.
Legal and Ethical Concerns:"Subject to" transactions can be legally and ethically complex. The parties involved should ensure they are fully aware of the legal implications in their jurisdiction and seek legal advice to avoid potential issues.
Disclosure:Depending on the jurisdiction, there may be requirements for the seller to disclose to the buyer that the property is subject to an existing mortgage.
Risks for Buyers and Sellers:Both buyers and sellers need to carefully consider the potential risks and benefits of a "subject to" transaction. Sellers should be cautious about handing over their property and mortgage responsibilities to buyers. In contrast, buyers should thoroughly assess their ability to make ongoing mortgage payments.

What are the pros and cons of a "Subject to Mortgage"?

Pros of "Subject to":

Creative Financing:Buyers who can't secure traditional financing due to credit issues or other reasons can still acquire property by taking over an existing mortgage.
Example:Jane has a low credit score due to past financial difficulties. She finds a property she loves but needs help to qualify for a new mortgage. By entering into a "subject to" agreement, she takes over the seller's existing mortgage and becomes a homeowner.
Faster Sale:Sellers facing financial distress or urgency to sell can find a buyer quickly without waiting for the lengthy process of a traditional sale.
Example:Mark needs to relocate for a job and sell his house within a month. He finds a buyer willing to take over his mortgage, allowing him to avoid foreclosure and move on.
Avoid Closing Costs:Buyers can avoid upfront costs associated with a new mortgage, such as down payments, loan origination fees, and other closing costs.
Example:Sarah wants to buy a property but needs more savings for a down payment. She can acquire the property through a "subject to" arrangement without requiring a large upfront amount.

Cons of "Subject to":

Legal and Ethical Concerns:"Subject to" transactions can raise legal and ethical questions, as the buyer assumes ownership without notifying the lender, potentially violating the mortgage agreement's terms.
Example:David sells his property "subject to" without informing the lender. The buyer defaults on payments, leading to foreclosure and damage to David's credit score due to the violation of the mortgage agreement.
Risks to Sellers:Sellers remain legally responsible for the mortgage even after the property is transferred, exposing them to potential liability if the buyer defaults.
Example:Lisa sells her house "subject to" to a buyer who stops making payments. The lender foreclosed on the property, negatively affecting Lisa's credit and leaving her financially liable for any remaining debt.
Due on Sale Clause:Lenders can exercise the "due on sale" clause, demanding full repayment of the loan upon discovering the change in ownership, potentially leading to financial strain for the buyer.
Example:John buys a property "subject to" with an existing mortgage. The lender discovers the transfer and demands full repayment, putting John in a difficult financial situation.
Lack of Control:Sellers lose control over the property, as they are no longer the legal owners. Buyers also face challenges if the lender discovers the change in ownership and demands repayment.
Example:Emily sells her property "subject to" and is unaware that the buyer isn't making payments. The lender forecloses on the property, and Emily loses her home without any control.

In both pros and cons, it's essential to understand that the outcome of a "Subject to Mortgage" transaction can vary greatly depending on individual circ*mstances, the parties involved, the terms of the mortgage, and local legal regulations. Before entering such an arrangement, seeking professional legal advice and thoroughly researching the implications is crucial.

The qualifications for a "Subject to Mortgage" transaction can vary based on factors such as the lender's policies, the terms of the existing mortgage, and local regulations. While it might be theoretically possible to do a "subject to" arrangement on different types of loans, there are practical limitations and considerations. Here's an overview:

Qualifications for Buyers:

Financial Stability:Buyers should have a stable financial situation and the ability to make mortgage payments. The lender's primary concern is that the mortgage continues to be paid on time.
Creditworthiness:While the buyer's credit history might not be as heavily scrutinized as in a traditional mortgage application, some lenders may still evaluate the buyer's creditworthiness to ensure they can make payments.
Legal and Ethical Standing:Buyers should know the legal and ethical implications of assuming the mortgage. They should be willing to follow the terms of the agreement and maintain open communication with the seller and lender.
Due Diligence:Buyers should conduct due diligence on the property, the existing mortgage terms, and any potential risks associated with a "subject to" transaction.

Types of Loans:

1. Conventional Mortgages:"Subject to Mortgage" transactions can be done on conventional mortgages. However, due to the "due on sale" clause in many traditional mortgage agreements, lenders may be more likely to enforce repayment if they discover the change in ownership.

2. FHA Loans:Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans typically have strict guidelines. Lenders might be more likely to call the loan due in a "subject to" situation due to the government-backed nature of FHA loans.

Conclusion:

"Subject to Mortgage" transactions can offer creative solutions for buyers and sellers in specific situations. However, they come with significant risks and legal considerations. Parties involved should seek professional legal advice and ensure they fully understand the implications before proceeding with this real estate transaction.